Words matter on social media: Who decides about the limits to freedom of speech?
We all saw the images of the rioters storming the US Capitol on January 6th. Most of us probably also noticed that following the insurrection, Twitter and Facebook banned Donald Trump from their platforms. While this might seem like a problem far from home, the insurrection also gives us food for thought in Europe. Distrust of institutions and false narratives are gaining ground everywhere and threaten to break up our democracies.
The ban of an elected official from social media invites discussion about the balance between online platforms being allowed to ban users who violate their policies and freedom of expression, especially of elected officials. It also asks us to consider the relationship between our governments and online platforms, since so far the CEO's of these platforms have been allowed to make these decisions without broad regulatory oversight by governments. To address this lack of oversight, the European Commission proposed the European Democracy Act, the Digital Services act, and the Digital Markets act.
- Do you think online platforms should be allowed to ban elected officials from their platforms?
- Who should take responsibility for what is said on social media and the possible following actions – is it the author or do tech companies share responsibility for what users post on their platforms?
- What are your fact-checking habits when you go through content on social media?
- Should there be more regulatory oversight by governments over these online platforms?
We have selected some resources to provide young people like you with background information and insights linked to the topic above.
Share your idea
Try to be as concrete as possible when sharing your idea. The more in depth you go the more impactful your answer will be.